Homework 1 (Tips) :

You can refer to “After all, you can’t yell ‘fire’ in a crowded theater” to help yourself write your decision. “The Supreme Court’s decision does suggest, though, that any future attempts to limit symbolic speech will have to be based on genuine threats of harm to public safety and not merely on the assertion that the speech is offensive or unsettling. In the Court’s own words, “the First Amendment does not permit such a shortcut.”

When symbols threaten: the line between speech, intimidation

Now, remember, I can encourage you to visit a page to curb your judgment, in the case I do so what counts the most? I do so which isn’t right or can it be right if my intent is in my view sincere, generous and noble?